I look at her with her head slumped on the table, and she smiles and I smile and for a moment there’s silence, but for that moment I feel strong. Not strong enough to face myself, but strong enough to go on.
Do and should Law and Morality overlap.
Law affects many aspects of our daily lives, from influencing politics, economics, to governmental decisions. Law is defined by John Austin, as a “command that is issued from a superior, the State, to and inferior, the individual or subjects, and enforced by sanctions. As a set of binding principles, law provides a clear cut boundary separating the unjust from society. Functioning as an objective system, it is free from emotions or personal prejudices. The concept of the Rule of Law, ensures that every individual, from the high king to the street sweeper, is considered on equal terms before the law.
Morality on the other hand is a code of values to guide man’s choices and actions – the choices and actions that determine the course and purpose of his life. A persons moral convictions often reflect those of his society, as conforming to what is considered morally acceptable and to the norms. American philosopher and novelist, Ayn Rand has often been quoted in her writing, stating, “What is morality? she asked. Judgement to distinguish right and wrong, vision to see the truth, and courage to act upon it, dedication to that which is good, integrity to stand by the good at any price.”
There exists distinctions between Law and Morality. Morality must evolve with the times, what is considered morally acceptable centuries ago, may no longer be applicable in a different modern setting such as ours; while Law, can be deliberately altered to conform with the times. Morality relies on the idea of that individuals are subject to human emotions, and as such, guilt and shame; with society being the final arbiter as to what is right and wrong. If a majority of society so chooses that abortion is morally acceptable, then would cease to be rejected as immoral. Morality is also subjective, a societies moral convictions might not match the other; as its culture diversifies with its geography. Law is an objective binding principle. It is imposed on every individual. If a man so decides to steal, he will be prosecuted by the law. When morality is breached, there is no formal adjudication, but society imposes its whim upon the offender. When there is breach of law; a formal punishment is imposed upon the offender by a formal legal system.
that awkward moment when you like someone you cant have
(Source: eletheowl, via blacksuitpinktie)
Tell me what a man finds sexually attractive and I will tell you his entire philosophy of life. Show me the woman he sleeps with and I will tell you his valuation of himself. No matter what corruption he’s taught about the virtue of selflessness, sex is the most profoundly selfish of all acts, an act which he cannot perform for any motive but his own enjoyment — just try to think of performing it in a spirit of selfless charity! — an act which is not possible in self-abasement, only in self-exaltation, only in the confidence of being desired and being worthy of desire. He will always be attracted to the woman who reflects the deepest vision of himself, the woman whose surrender permits him to experience — or fake — a sense of self-esteem. The man who is proudly certain of his own value, will want the highest type of woman he can find, the woman he admires, the strongest, the hardest to conquer — because only the possession of a heroine will give him the sense of achievement, not the possession of a brainless slut.
He does not seek to gain his value, he seeks to express it. There is no conflict between the standards of his mind and the desires of his body. But the man who is convinced of his own worthlessness will be drawn to a woman he despises — because she will reflect his own secret self, she will release him from that objective reality in which he is a fraud, she will give him a momentary illusion of his own value and a momentary escape from the moral code that damns him. Observe the ugly mess which most men make of their sex lives — and observe the mess of contradictions which they hold as their moral philosophy. One proceeds from the other. Love is our response to our highest values — and can be nothing else. Let a man corrupt his values and his view of existence, let him profess that love is not self-enjoyment but self-denial, that virtue consists, not of pride, but of pity or pain or weakness or sacrifice, that the noblest love is born, not of admiration, but of charity, not in response to values, but in response to flaws — and he will have cut himself in two.
His body will not obey him, it will not respond, it will make him impotent toward the woman he professes to love and draw him to the lowest type of whore he can find. His body will always follow the ultimate logic of his deepest convictions; if he believes that flaws are values, he has damned existence as evil and only the evil will attract him. He has damned himself and he will feel that depravity is all he is worthy of enjoying. He has equated virtue with pain and he will feel that vice is the only realm of pleasure. Then he will scream that his body has vicious desires of its own which his mind cannot conquer, that sex is sin, that true love is a pure emotion of the spirit. And then he will wonder why love brings him nothing but boredom, and sex — nothing but shame.
